A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut

This paper assesses discourse pragmatics as a potential explanation for the production and omission of arguments in early child language. It employs a set of features that characterize typical situations of informativeness (G reenfield and Smith 1976; Clancy 1993, 1997) to examine argument status in data from four children aged 2;0 through 3;6 learning Inuktitut as a first language. Results based on logistic regression analyses suggest that a disc ourse-pragmatics account of argument representation has good explanatory ad equacy, and that several of the features characterizing informativeness ave good indicators of those arguments that tend so be overtly produced rather than omitted in early child language.