The ixodid tick species attaching to domestic dogs and cats in Great Britain and Ireland

Citation
Nh. Ogden et al., The ixodid tick species attaching to domestic dogs and cats in Great Britain and Ireland, MED VET ENT, 14(3), 2000, pp. 332-338
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Entomology/Pest Control
Journal title
MEDICAL AND VETERINARY ENTOMOLOGY
ISSN journal
0269283X → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
332 - 338
Database
ISI
SICI code
0269-283X(200009)14:3<332:TITSAT>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
The species of ixodid ticks, attached to dogs and cats presented to veterin ary practices in Great Britain and Ireland were identified. Most host anima ls carried only one tick species with Ixodes ricinus Linne (Acari: Ixodidae ) being the most common, identified on 52% of animals, Ixodes hexagonus Lea ch (Acari: Ixodidae) the second most common (on 39%) and Ixodes canisuga Jo hnston (Acari: Ixodidae) the third most common (on 11%). A significantly hi gher proportion of dogs than cats carried I. ricinus, while I. hexagonus wa s more frequently carried by cats. One animal carried a single specimen of Haemaphysalis punctata Canestrini & Fanzago (Acari: Ixodidae), one carried a Dermacentor reticulatus Fabricius (Acari: Ixodidae) but none carried Rhip icephalus sanguineus Latreille (Acari: Ixodidae). This indicates that the l atter two species, vectors of 'exotic' tick-borne diseases, remain at low d ensities in Great Britain and Ireland. Retrospective information on exposur e of the animals to different habitats and geographic regions was collected by questionnaire and subject to contingency table and logistic regression analysis. Woodlands and moorlands were habitats significantly associated wi th I. ricinus attachment. Exposure to urban parks was significantly associa ted with I. hexagonus attachment and exposure to boarding kennels and catte ries was significantly associated with I. canisuga attachment. Ixodes hexag onus, rather than I. ricinus, was the ixodid tick species most likely to be encountered by urban populations of dogs and cats and, by inference, possi bly also humans. The implications of these findings, for the transmission o f tick-borne pathogens to dogs, cats and humans are discussed.