We see things. We also perceptually demonstrate things. There seems to be s
ome sort of ling between these two phenomena. Indeed, in the standard case,
the former is accompanied by a capacity for the latter. One sees a dog and
can, on the basis of one's perceptual capacities, think thoughts of the fo
rm 'That is F.' But how strong is that link? Does seeing a thing (in the su
ccess sense of seeing) inevitably bring with it the capacity for perceptual
ly demonstrating it? In what follows, we argue for a negative answer to thi
s question. In so doing, we hope to shed some light on the phenomenon of pe
rceptual demonstration. After presenting the main argument in section one,
we go in section two to consider a series of objections and replies.