ESTIMATION OF TIMBER VOLUME IN A CONIFEROUS PLANTATION FOREST USING LANDSAT TM

Citation
Cm. Trotter et al., ESTIMATION OF TIMBER VOLUME IN A CONIFEROUS PLANTATION FOREST USING LANDSAT TM, International journal of remote sensing, 18(10), 1997, pp. 2209-2223
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Photographic Tecnology","Remote Sensing
ISSN journal
01431161
Volume
18
Issue
10
Year of publication
1997
Pages
2209 - 2223
Database
ISI
SICI code
0143-1161(1997)18:10<2209:EOTVIA>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Optimisation of economic return from forests requires that comprehensi ve forest inventory data be available to support the design of harvest ing strategies. Such inventory data can potentially be obtained by rem ote sensing. This study investigates the accuracy with which wood volu me (m(3) ha(-1)) in a plantation forest can be calculated from Landsat TM data at the pixel and forest-stand spatial scales. Wood volumes we re estimated from regression analysis, nonparametric line-fitting, and an N-dimensional K-nearest-neighbour classification scheme. At the pi xel scale, relations between Landsat data and measured wood volume wer e found to be significant but weak, with r(2) values of less than or e qual to 0.3, and with correspondingly poor estimates of wood volume (r oot-mean-square errors-rmses-of > 100 m(3) ha(-1)). By averaging the p ixel-scale estimates, wood volume estimates of acceptable accuracy wer e obtained for forest-stand areas of about 40 ha (rmses of less than o r equal to 46 m(3) ha(-1)). Parametric regression performed slightly b etter overall than non-parametric line fitting techniques for estimati ng wood volume. Estimates of similar accuracy to those obtained by reg ression were also given by NK-classification at the pixel-scale, provi ded K was large (greater than or equal to 15), although the classifier produced biased results at the forest-stand scale. It is concluded th at Landsat TM only provides an acceptable data source for estimating w ood volumes in plantation forests for areas of about 40 ha and larger. The very low dynamic range in the Landsat data is probably a signific ant factor limiting its use for inventory at more detailed scales.