C. Erggelet et al., The operative treatment of full thickness cartilage defects in the knee joint with autologous chondrocyte transplantation, SAUDI MED J, 21(8), 2000, pp. 715-721
Objectives: The high clinical and socio-economical impact of cartilage defe
cts and chondral degeneration is well-known. After trauma or without a know
n etiology, often young patients suffer from pain and a loss of function le
ading into a decrease of physical activity and, more severe, into long term
disability and unemployment, The clinical use of autologous chondrocyte tr
ansplantation was introduced in 1994 reporting the data of a pilot study. T
he objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of this method of su
rgery.
Methods: Autologous chondrocyte transplantation has been established in our
department since 1995 for the treatment of large, full thickness cartilage
defects which can be completely covered with hyaline-like cartilage withou
t harming the subchondral bone plate. Our first patients (n=24) all showed
Grade IV lesions and an average defect size of 6.27 cm(2). All but 4 of the
patients had at least 1 cartilage defect related operation on the knee.
Results: The patients and the clinicians rating indicated an increase of a
modified Cincinnati Knee score from 3.6 point pre-operation to 6.9 points a
fter 6 months and 8.1 points at 12 months on a scale from 1 (bad) to 10 (ex
cellent). These results support the data of an international multicenter st
udy with almost 2000 patients. The 5 year results described by the originat
e authors are good to excellent in 85%-95% with an adverse event rate of 5%
.
Conclusion: Autologous chondrocyte transplantation has to be considered a s
afe and effective method for the treatment of large full thickness cartilag
e defects. Alternative treatments are symptomatical: drilling, abrasion, la
vage, chondroplasty, or osteotomies. The short term results are promising b
ut a lot of patients have to be treated for osteoarthritis as a consequence
of failure with total joint arthroplasty. Osteochondral transplantations h
ave the disadvantage of limited harvesting sites and the impairment of the
subchondral bone plate.