A recent trend among Marxist economists tries to vindicate Marx, in opposit
ion to criticism from mainstream economics and to developments in what may
be called the mainstream of Marxist theory in the 20th century. It does thi
s, however, by insisting on the literal truth of Marx's formulations, espec
ially in Volume III of Capital. Well-known difficulties with these formulat
ions are countered by resort to a "temporal" interpretation, in which input
s and outputs are differently time-dated. This, however, reduces either to
the abandonment of theory altogether, or to replication of firmly establish
ed results in value theory. While temporal dynamics contributes to our unde
rstanding of both value formation and capitalist accumulation, no good purp
ose is served by a fundamentalist orientation, argument by appeal to textua
l authority, and denigration of the achievements in Marxist economics in th
e time since Marx wrote.