Spanish has left-headed compounds which are not as productive as their left
-headed counterparts in other languages. This presence or absence of produc
tivity has been attributed to a binary parameter according to which N-N com
pounding, as opposed to nominal constructions in which the head noun takes
a complement as in 'the destruction of the city', would be the superset or
marked option. Furthermore, the idiosyncratic nature of Spanish N-N compoun
ding has been attributed to the make-up of Spanish Nouns. Specifically, it
has been proposed that Spanish Nouns have a 'word marker' which triggers L1
acquisition of these constructions. Based on the results of two picture te
sts intended to elicit actual command of N-N compounding strategies, as wel
l as word order patterns and gender marking patterns, we argue that 1) N-N
compounding is not a marked construction; 2) adult L2 acquisition of Spanis
h N-N compounds is triggered by head directionality (a processing trigger)
rather than by the 'word-marker' (a representational trigger) which is supp
osed to trigger L1 acquisition of these compounds.