Over the past decade, infrared microspectroscopy mapping has been applied t
o a wide variety of sample types [H.J. Humecki (Ed.), Practical Guide to In
frared Microspectroscopy, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1995.], including polyme
rs [J.A. Reffner, in: P.E. Russell (Ed.), Microbeam Analysis, San Francisco
Press, San Francisco, 1989, p. 167.], wheat kernels [D.L. Wetzel, J.A. Ref
fner, Cereal Foods World 38 (1) (1993) 9.], painted manuscripts [M.R. Derri
ck, Mater. Res. Sec. Symp. Proc. 352 (1995) 97.], and carcinoma tissue sect
ions [P. Lasch, D. Naumann, in: P. Carmona (Ed.), Spectroscopy of Biologica
l Molecules: Modem Trends, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1997, p
. 441.]. However, little has been mentioned regarding proper mapping condit
ions and data treatment. Proper experiment design (sample preparation, map
definition) and data treatments (viewing formats, profile creation) are ess
ential for success, especially if the sample contains features that are sma
ller than the diffraction limit (10 mu m at 1000 cm(-1)). The data obtained
from line maps is especially susceptible to misinterpretation if not handl
ed properly. For example, diffraction is a well-known property that every i
nfrared microspectroscopist is aware of, yet its effect on mapping experime
nts, especially when it comes to creating profiles is not documented and is
often neglected. This paper will discuss how mapping experiments and profi
les can be successfully used to extract useful and valid data from line map
s. Examples will be discussed of two challenging line map samples: finding
a thin adhesive layer, and the reverse-engineering of a complex multi-layer
laminate. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.