Prospective evaluation of two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism

Citation
Re. Jackson et al., Prospective evaluation of two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, ACAD EM MED, 7(9), 2000, pp. 994-998
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
10696563 → ACNP
Volume
7
Issue
9
Year of publication
2000
Pages
994 - 998
Database
ISI
SICI code
1069-6563(200009)7:9<994:PEOTTE>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Objective: To prospectively examine the diagnostic accuracy of two-dimensio nal transthoracic echocardiography (2-D echo) in emergency department (ED) patients being evaluated for acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods: This w as a 14-month prospective observational trial of a convenience sample of ED patients undergoing evaluation for suspected PE at a suburban teaching hos pital. The 2-D echo was defined as positive if any two of the following wer e noted: right ventricular dilation, abnormal septal motion, loss of right ventricular contractility, elevated pulmonary artery or right ventricular p ressures, moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation, or visualization of a clot seen in the right ventricle or pulmonary artery. The patient was cons idered to have a PE if one of the following was positive: a pulmonary angio gram, contrast helical computed tomography, a magnetic resonance angiogram, a high-probability ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scan without contradictory evidence, or an intermediate-probability V/Q scan with ultrasonic evidence of deep venous thrombosis. Results: Of 225 cases identified, 39 met the def ined criteria for PE (17%). A 2-D echo was performed on 124 patients (55%), of whom 27 (22%) had PE. In 20 patients the 2-D echo had at least two indi cators of right ventricular strain; however, only 11 of these patients had confirmed pulmonary embolus. The 2-D echo had a sensitivity of 0.41 (95% CI = 0.32 to 0.49) and a specificity of 0.91 (95% CI = 0.86 to 0.96). The lik elihood ratio positive was a moderately strong 4.4, with a weak likelihood ratio negative of 0.6. Conclusions: Bedside 2-D echo is not a sensitive tes t for the diagnosis of PE in ED patients. Positive findings moderately incr ease the suspicion for PE but are not diagnostic.