Ip. Steiner et al., Faculty evaluation by residents in an emergency medicine program: A new evaluation instrument, ACAD EM MED, 7(9), 2000, pp. 1015-1021
Objective: Evaluation of preceptors in training programs is essential; howe
ver, little research has been performed in the setting of the emergency dep
artment (ED). The goal of this pilot study was to determine the validity an
d reliability of a faculty evaluation instrument-the Emergency Rotation (ER
) scale-developed specifically for use in emergency medicine (EM). Methods:
A prospective study comparing the ER scale with two alternative faculty ev
aluation instruments was completed in three of the five EDs affiliated with
an EM teaching program, where emergency physicians are members of the clin
ical teaching faculty. The participants were 18 residents (postgraduate yea
rs 1, 2, and 3) who were completing four-week clinical rotations in EM. Res
idents at the end of the rotation recorded their evaluations of each emerge
ncy physician with whom they had clinical encounters on the following evalu
ation tools: the ER scale, a longer validated scale (Irby), and a global as
sessment scale (GAS). Domain scores were correlated with the previously val
idated scale and the GAS to determine validity using a multitrait-multimeth
od matrix. The reliability of the ER scale was measured using a Chronbach's
alpha coefficient. Results: Forty-eight preceptor evaluations were complet
ed on 29 individual preceptors. The rating of preceptors was high using the
ER scale (median: 16 of 20; IQR: 13, 18), Irby (median: 300 of 378; IQR: 2
67, 321), or GAS (mean: 7.8 of 10; SD: 1.3). Domain scores for each tool we
re used in the multitrait-multimethod matrix and the correlations between a
previously validated tool and the ER scale were found to be high (>0.70) i
n the various domains. The internal consistency of the ER scale was also hi
gh (r = 0.85). Conclusions: The ER scale appears to be valid and reliable.
It performs well when compared with previously psychometrically tested tool
s. It is a sensible, well-adapted tool for the teaching environment offered
by EM.