Nontranspiring (covered) leaf water potential on greenhouse-grown chickpea
(Cicer arietinum L.) leaves was measured with the pressure chamber and leaf
-cutter psychrometer techniques over a range of water potentials. Potential
s measured with the leaf-cutter psychrometer technique were highly variable
and not well correlated with the values measured with the pressure chamber
. The objectives of this study were to identify the basis for the discrepan
cy between the two techniques and to identify procedures to minimize the er
rors. Intentionally damaging 15% of the disc caused an increase (less negat
ive) in the potentials measured in the psychrometers relative to those meas
ured in the pressure chamber. When leaves were sampled with a sharp razor o
r a new biopsy punch, however, potential values similar to those measured b
y the pressure chamber were obtained. We conclude that unintentional damage
caused by the psychrometer's cutter can give erroneous values of leaf wate
r potential measured by leaf-cutter psychrometry.