Medical education has changed significantly over the past two decades in ma
ny European countries. Rheumatologists have kept up to date with this chang
e by becoming involved in curricular reform, and with the development of na
tional,(1) and European(2) rheumatology curricula for undergraduate and pos
tgraduate education Most of the examples of change cited in this article ar
e based on the UK medical schools, but it is likely that these changes are
reflected in other European countries. In addition, medical schools are in
the midst of the implementation of substantial reforms of their own curricu
la after the General Medical Council recommendations.(3) The quality of rhe
umatology teaching is in the process of being evaluated as part of the Qual
ity Assurance Agency visits, and there is likely to be an increasing demand
for teachers in higher education (including medicine) to be trained follow
ing the Dearing report.(4) Provided that we can continue to keep abreast of
these changes the standard of undergraduate teaching in rheumatology will
improve considerably.
One of the current themes of medical education is that it has become recogn
ised as a lifelong process.(5) Our undergraduates need to acquire learning
skills that will take them from their undergraduate experience, through the
ir general clinical training, specialist registrar training, and continuing
medical education as consultant rheumatologists. Another theme is the shif
t from a teacher centred approach, where the emphasis is on the teachers an
d what they do, to a learner centred approach, where the emphasis is on wha
t the students learn. To achieve this shift, a learning facilitator replace
s the traditional didactic teacher, and traditional didactic teaching metho
ds are replaced by interactive teaching in smaller groups.
The principles behind these methods are based on a body of educational rese
arch that has identified characteristics related to effective university te
aching and learning. The aim of this article is to refer to the background
educational theory, and to outline newer teaching methods developed on this
basis. We hope also to provide a practical guide for our rheumatology teac
hers (and learners) in this new millennium.