Angiographic evaluation of graft patency in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting

Citation
Fb. Jatene et al., Angiographic evaluation of graft patency in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting, ANN THORAC, 70(3), 2000, pp. 1066-1069
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
ISSN journal
00034975 → ACNP
Volume
70
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1066 - 1069
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4975(200009)70:3<1066:AEOGPI>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Background. The objective of this report is to describe our experience usin g minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting and to evaluate angiographic patency of anastomoses. Methods. A total of 120 patients (86 men) were operated on, with ages rangi ng from 30 to 83 years (mean = 61.2 years). Two access routes were used: fo r single left anterior descending coronary artery lesions an 8 cm anterior minithoracotomy was performed at the fourth left intercostal space. Extraco rporeal circulation was not used. In the Last 82 patients a restraining dev ice was used for the regional reduction of heart beats. Coronary cineangiog raphy was carried out between postoperative days 1 and 3 in 84 (70%) patien ts. Anastomoses were graded: grade A, no blocks; grade B, blocks of more th an 50%; grade C, occlusion. This evaluation was performed for two different periods: in the first period a restraining device was not used and in the second period a restraining device was used. Results. In the first study period (38 anastomoses) coronary cineangiograph y showed grade A, 79%, grade B, 5.2%, and grade C, 15.8%. Ln the second stu dy period (62 anastomoses), angiography showed grade A, 90.4%, grade B, 6.4 %, and grade C, 3.2%. Early mortality was 1.6%. Conclusions. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting is a good a lternative for some groups of patients. Anastomotic results seem to be bett er when a restraining device is used. (Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1066-9) (C) 2000 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.