Mupirocin prophylaxis against methicillin-susceptible, methicillin-resistant, or vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus epidermidis vascular-graft infection

Citation
A. Giacometti et al., Mupirocin prophylaxis against methicillin-susceptible, methicillin-resistant, or vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus epidermidis vascular-graft infection, ANTIM AG CH, 44(10), 2000, pp. 2842-2844
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology
Journal title
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
ISSN journal
00664804 → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
10
Year of publication
2000
Pages
2842 - 2844
Database
ISI
SICI code
0066-4804(200010)44:10<2842:MPAMM>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
A rat model was used to investigate the efficacy of mupirocin in the preven tion of vascular prosthetic graft infection due to Staphylococcus epidermid is strains with different susceptibility patterns (methicillin susceptible, methicillin resistant, and with intermediate resistance to vancomycin). Th e effect of mupirocin-soaked Dacron was compared to that of perioperative i ntraperitoneal prophylaxis with vancomycin. Graft infections were establish ed in the back subcutaneous tissue of adult male Wistar rats by implantatio n of Dacron prostheses (1 cm(2)) followed by topical inoculation with 5 x 1 0(7) CFU of one staphylococcal strain, The study included a control group ( no graft contamination), three contaminated groups that did not receive any antibiotic prophylaxis, three contaminated groups that received mupirocin- soaked grafts, three contaminated groups in which perioperative intraperito neal vancomycin prophylaxis (10 mg/kg of body weight) was administered, and three contaminated groups that received mupirocin-soaked grafts and periop erative intraperitoneal vancomycin prophylaxis (10 mg/kg), The grafts were sterilely removed 7 days after implantation, and the infection,vas evaluate d by using sonication and quantitative agar culture, Data analysis showed t he efficacy of mupirocin against all three strains, with growth of the stra ins in treated rats significantly different than that in the untreated cont rol, In addition, mupirocin was more effective than vancomycin against the strain with intermediate susceptibility to the glycopeptide. Finally, the c ombination of mupirocin and vancomycin produced complete suppression of the growth of all of the strains.