K. Asagoshi et al., Comparison of substrate specificities of Escherichia coli endonuclease IIIand its mouse homologue (mNTH1) using defined oligonucleotide substrates, BIOCHEM, 39(37), 2000, pp. 11389-11398
Escherichia coli endonuclease III (Endo III) and its eukaryotic homologues
are major repair enzymes for pyrimidine lesions formed by reactive oxygen s
pecies and ionizing radiation. In the present study, the activities of Endo
III and its mouse homologue (mNTH1) have been compared using defined oligo
nucleotide substrates containing a urea residue (UR), two cis-thymine glyco
l (TG) diastereoisomers, 5,6-dihydrothymine (DHT), and 5-hydroxyuracil (HOU
). The substrates were incubated with Endo III and mNTH1, and their activit
ies were compared based on the product analysis by gel electrophoresis. End
o III recognized all base lesions tested, but the activity for DHT was extr
emely lower than other substrates. In contrast, albeit some preference of U
R, mNTH1 showed essentially comparable activities for all substrates includ
ing DHT. Comparison of the enzymatic parameters for cis-TG and DHT revealed
that large decreases in the affinity (K-m, 27-fold) and k(cat) (11-fold) r
elative to cis-TG made DHT an very poor substrate for Endo III. mNTH1 had c
omparable affinities and k(cat) for both cis-TG and DHT, though turnover (k
(cat)) of mNTH1 was notably slower than Endo III. In view of the reaction m
echanism, the paired base effect on the damage recognition by the two enzym
es was also examined. The activities of Endo III for UR and HOU were paired
base-independent, but those for cis TG and DHT were significantly enhanced
when paired with G. With mNTH1, the paired base effect was evident only fo
r DHT. The variations of the repair activity with paired bases and enzymes
are discussed in relation to the base flipping mechanism suggested for base
excision repair enzymes.