Semen analysis after vasectomy: when and how many?

Citation
C. Badrakumar et al., Semen analysis after vasectomy: when and how many?, BJU INT, 86(4), 2000, pp. 479-481
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
BJU INTERNATIONAL
ISSN journal
14644096 → ACNP
Volume
86
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
479 - 481
Database
ISI
SICI code
1464-4096(200009)86:4<479:SAAVWA>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Objective To assess patient compliance for semen analysis after vasectomy, and to determine the timing and number of semen analyses required to confir m sterility. Patients and methods The study included 1321 men who underwent vasectomy be tween October 1995 and June 1998. They were followed up in two groups; in g roup 1 (one-test method) 961 consecutive patients were asked to provide a s emen sample for analysis 4 months after vasectomy. Sterility was defined as the absence of sperm in one sample. If sperm were present in the sample, t he test was repeated at monthly intervals until there were no sperm. In gro up 2 (two-test method) 360 consecutive patients were advised to provide sem en samples 3 and 4 months after vasectomy. The absence of sperm in two cons ecutive samples was defined as the criterion to declare the man azoospermic . The presence of sperm in one sample required further samples every month until two consecutive azoospermic samples were produced. Results In group 1, 810 patients provided semen samples, of which 783 (97%) had no sperm and the men were thus declared azoospermic. The remaining 27 (3%) samples contained sperm; six men withdrew from follow-up at various ti mes but 21 patients produced a negative sample at some time within 7 months and were declared azoospermic. At the end of the follow-up, 804 (84%) pati ents had been declared azoospermic. In group 2, 294 (82%) patients provided a semen sample after 3 months but only 259 (72%) did so after 4 months. Of the patients providing the first sample, 287 (98%) were azoospermic, and a fter the second 252 (97%) were azoospermic. At the end of the follow-up 255 (71%) patients were declared azoospermic. There was no reported paternity in any of the men. Conclusion These results suggest that compliance was better in group 1; whe n the patients in group 2 were asked to provide a second sample the complia nce decreased significantly. The percentage of patients producing an azoosp ermic sample was similar for semen provided after 3 and 4 months. Thus, pro vided that the patient is adequately warned about the risk of failure of th e vasectomy at any time during his life, a single semen analysis after 3 mo nths is sufficient grounds for discontinuing other contraceptive precaution s.