Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) instruments are increasingly importa
nt in evaluating health care, especially in cancer trials. When planning a
trial, one essential step is the calculation of a sample size, which will a
llow a reasonable chance (power) of detecting a pre-specified difference (e
ffect size) at a given level of statistical significance. It is almost mand
atory to include this calculation in research protocols. Many researchers q
uote means and standard deviations to determine effect sizes, and assume th
e data will have a Normal distribution to calculate their required sample s
ize. We have investigated the distribution of scores for two commonly used
HRQoL instruments completed by lung cancer patients, and have established t
hat scores do not have the Normal distribution form. We demonstrate that an
assumption of Normality can lead to unrealistically sized studies. Our rec
ommendation is to use a technique that is based on the fact that the HRQoL
data are ordinal and makes minimal but realistic assumptions. (C) 2000 Canc
er Research Campaign.