Long term results of a randomized study by the Swedish Melanoma Study Group on 2-cm versus 5-cm resection margins for patients with cutaneous melanoma with a tumor thickness of 0.8-2.0 mm
G. Cohn-cedermark et al., Long term results of a randomized study by the Swedish Melanoma Study Group on 2-cm versus 5-cm resection margins for patients with cutaneous melanoma with a tumor thickness of 0.8-2.0 mm, CANCER, 89(7), 2000, pp. 1495-1501
BACKGROUND. Large, prospective, randomized trials with long term follow-up
are required to obtain an unbiased evaluation of the significance of resect
ion margins in patients with cutaneous melanoma.
METHODS, The Swedish Melanoma Study Group performed a prospective, randomiz
ed, multicenter study of patients with primary melanoma located on trunk or
extremities and with a tumor thickness > 0.8 mm and less than or equal to
2 mm. Patients were allocated randomly to a 2-cm excision margin or a 5-cm
excision margin. In total, 989 patients were recruited during the period 19
82-1991. The median follow-up, was 11 years (range, 7-17 years) for estimat
ion of survival and 8 years (range, 0-17 years) for evaluation of recurrent
disease.
RESULTS. The crude rate of local recurrence, defined as a recurrence in the
scar or transplant, was < 1% (8 of 989 patients). Twenty percent of the pa
tients (194 of 989 patients) experienced any disease recurrence, and 15% (1
46 of 989 patients) died of melanoma. There were no statistically significa
nt differences between the two treatment arms. In a multivariate Cox analys
is with patients allocated to wide excision as the reference group, the est
imated relative hazards for overall survival and recurrence free survival a
mong those allocated to a 2-cm resection margin were 0.96 (95% confidence i
nterval, 0.75-1.24), and 1.02 (95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.30), respect
ively.
CONCLUSIONS. In this long term follow-up study, local recurrences were foun
d to be rare among patients with tumors > 0.8 mm thick and less than or equ
al to 2.0 mm thick. Mo difference in recurrence rate or survival between th
e two treatment groups was found. Patients in this category can be treated
with a resection margin of 2 cm as safely as with a resection margin of 5 c
m. Cancer 2000;89:1495-501. (C) 2000 American Cancer Society.