Long term results of a randomized study by the Swedish Melanoma Study Group on 2-cm versus 5-cm resection margins for patients with cutaneous melanoma with a tumor thickness of 0.8-2.0 mm

Citation
G. Cohn-cedermark et al., Long term results of a randomized study by the Swedish Melanoma Study Group on 2-cm versus 5-cm resection margins for patients with cutaneous melanoma with a tumor thickness of 0.8-2.0 mm, CANCER, 89(7), 2000, pp. 1495-1501
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
CANCER
ISSN journal
0008543X → ACNP
Volume
89
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1495 - 1501
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-543X(20001001)89:7<1495:LTROAR>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Large, prospective, randomized trials with long term follow-up are required to obtain an unbiased evaluation of the significance of resect ion margins in patients with cutaneous melanoma. METHODS, The Swedish Melanoma Study Group performed a prospective, randomiz ed, multicenter study of patients with primary melanoma located on trunk or extremities and with a tumor thickness > 0.8 mm and less than or equal to 2 mm. Patients were allocated randomly to a 2-cm excision margin or a 5-cm excision margin. In total, 989 patients were recruited during the period 19 82-1991. The median follow-up, was 11 years (range, 7-17 years) for estimat ion of survival and 8 years (range, 0-17 years) for evaluation of recurrent disease. RESULTS. The crude rate of local recurrence, defined as a recurrence in the scar or transplant, was < 1% (8 of 989 patients). Twenty percent of the pa tients (194 of 989 patients) experienced any disease recurrence, and 15% (1 46 of 989 patients) died of melanoma. There were no statistically significa nt differences between the two treatment arms. In a multivariate Cox analys is with patients allocated to wide excision as the reference group, the est imated relative hazards for overall survival and recurrence free survival a mong those allocated to a 2-cm resection margin were 0.96 (95% confidence i nterval, 0.75-1.24), and 1.02 (95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.30), respect ively. CONCLUSIONS. In this long term follow-up study, local recurrences were foun d to be rare among patients with tumors > 0.8 mm thick and less than or equ al to 2.0 mm thick. Mo difference in recurrence rate or survival between th e two treatment groups was found. Patients in this category can be treated with a resection margin of 2 cm as safely as with a resection margin of 5 c m. Cancer 2000;89:1495-501. (C) 2000 American Cancer Society.