Comparison of heterocyclic amine levels in home-cooked meats with exposureindicators (United States)

Citation
Ga. Keating et al., Comparison of heterocyclic amine levels in home-cooked meats with exposureindicators (United States), CANC CAUSE, 11(8), 2000, pp. 731-739
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
ISSN journal
09575243 → ACNP
Volume
11
Issue
8
Year of publication
2000
Pages
731 - 739
Database
ISI
SICI code
0957-5243(200009)11:8<731:COHALI>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Objective: To compare indicators of heterocyclic amine (HCA) exposure with HCA concentrations in home-cooked meat samples. Methods: Pan-fried hamburger and steak samples were obtained from individua ls stating a preference for medium, well done and very well done meat. Conc entrations of DiMeIQx, IFP, MeIQx and PhIP were determined by HPLC. Results: HCA concentrations at the three doneness levels were not significa ntly different using the participants' self-reported doneness preference to categorize samples. Using doneness levels determined at the time the meat was cooked and photograph analysis to categorize samples, HCA concentration s increased with doneness level and significant differences were observed b etween the very well done and lower doneness levels. When assigned to donen ess levels by photograph analysis, mean concentrations (ng/g cooked meat) o f DiMeIQx, IFP, MeIQx, and PhIP were 0.18, 0.16, 0.65 and 0.47 in well done hamburger and 0.61, 0.74, 1.88 and 2.04 in very well done hamburger. In st eak, mean concentrations were 0.24, 0.10, 0.79 and 0.59 in well done steak and 0.45, 0.14, 1.87 and 0.62 in very well done steak. Conclusions: HCA levels in home-cooked meat samples were significantly diff erent when samples were visually classified for doneness, but not when self -reported doneness preference was used to classify doneness.