Lifetime occupational physical activity and incidental prostate cancer (Canada)

Citation
I. Bairati et al., Lifetime occupational physical activity and incidental prostate cancer (Canada), CANC CAUSE, 11(8), 2000, pp. 759-764
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
ISSN journal
09575243 → ACNP
Volume
11
Issue
8
Year of publication
2000
Pages
759 - 764
Database
ISI
SICI code
0957-5243(200009)11:8<759:LOPAAI>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the risk of incidenta l prostate cancer associated with occupational physical activity in a popul ation of patients treated for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by transur ethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Methods: This case-control study was conducted in men aged 45 and over refe rred for TURP to relieve the symptoms of BPH in one of the eight hospitals of the Quebec City area between October 1990 and December 1992. Cases (n = 64) were all men incidentally diagnosed with prostate cancer and controls w ere the 546 patients with solely a histological diagnosis of BPH. At the ti me of their interview, the patients completed a diet history questionnaire and a general questionnaire including a lifetime occupational history. Phys ical activity was estimated for each job according to data from the US Depa rtment of Labor. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of incidental prostate cancer associa ted with occupational physical activity while adjusting for confounders. Results: A positive association was observed between "ever having a job wit h sedentary/light work" and incidental prostate cancer (OR = 1.9; 95% CI = 1.1-3.3). ORs for prostate cancer associated with 0%, 1-49%, and greater th an or equal to 50% of life spent in jobs with sedentary/light work were 1.0 , 1.6 (95% CI = 0.8-3.1), and 2.5 (95% CI = 1.2-5.2), respectively (p-value for trend = 0.01). Occupational physical activity in the job held during t he longest period was inversely associated with prostate cancer: ORs were 1 .0, 0.5 (95% CI = 0.2-1.2), 0.4 (95% CI = 0.2-0.9) and 0.2 (95% CI = 0.1-0. 7) for sedentary, light, moderate, and high/very high levels, respectively (p-value for trend = 0.008). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that physical activity at wo rk could have a beneficial effect on the occurrence of prostate cancer.