Da. Hurley et al., Biopsychosocial screening questionnaire for patients with low back pain: Preliminary report of utility in physiotherapy practice in Northern Ireland, CLIN J PAIN, 16(3), 2000, pp. 214-228
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the potential utility o
f a new biopsychosocial screening questionnaire (Acute Low Back Pain Screen
ing Questionnaire) by exploring the relation between it and several physica
l risk factors and posttreatment outcomes so as to establish a cutoff point
for the local population. The relation between the screening questionnaire
and valid and reliable outcome measures of pain and functional disability
was also explored.
Design: Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies were conducted on patients
referred for physiotherapy for low back pain to a large Healthcare Trust i
n Northern Ireland. Before initial assessment, patients completed the scree
ning questionnaire and outcome measures, were questioned about known physic
al risk factors, and then received physiotherapy. At final discharge, the o
utcome variables-the "number of treatments" and patient's current work stat
us ("return to work [yes/no]")-were recorded, and patients recompleted the
outcome measures.
Patients: One hundred eighteen patients gave written informed consent to pa
rticipate in this study.
Results: Significant associations were detected between questionnaire score
s and pretreatment "leisure time exercise," "analgesic medication use," and
"subjective anesthesia"; posttreatment "return to work"; and "number of ph
ysiotherapy treatments" as well as pain and functional disability measures.
A cutoff "at-risk" score of 112 was calculated, which correctly classified
74% of patients who received more than six treatments and 80% of patients
who failed to return to work at the end of treatment.
Conclusions: The findings of this study provide preliminary evidence of the
utility of this biopsychosocial screening questionnaire for future use in
clinical intervention studies in the Northern Ireland National Health Servi
ce. Further comparative investigations in other health care settings are wa
rranted.