Usefulness of procalcitonin for diagnosis of infection in cardiac surgicalpatients

Citation
A. Aouifi et al., Usefulness of procalcitonin for diagnosis of infection in cardiac surgicalpatients, CRIT CARE M, 28(9), 2000, pp. 3171-3176
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00903493 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
9
Year of publication
2000
Pages
3171 - 3176
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-3493(200009)28:9<3171:UOPFDO>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Objective: To determine the value of procalcitonin (PCT) as a marker of pos toperative infection after cardiac surgery. Design: A prospective single institution three phase study. Setting: Univer sity cardiac surgical intensive care unit(31 beds). Patients. Phase I: To determine the normal perioperative kinetics of PCT, 2 0 consecutive patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmo nary bypass were included. Phase 2:To determine whether PCT may be useful f or diagnosis of postoperative infection, 97 consecutive patients with suspe cted infection were included. Phase 3: To determine the ability of PCT to d ifferentiate patients with septic shock from those with cardiogenic shock, 26 patients with postoperative circulatory failure were compared. Measurements and Main Results: Phase 1: Serum samples were drawn for PCT de termination after induction of anesthesia (baseline), at the end of surgery , and daily until postoperative day (POD) 8. Baseline serum PCT concentrati on was 0.17 +/- 0.08 ng/mL (mean +/- SD). Serum PCT increased after cardiac surgery with a peak on POD 1 (1.08 +/- 1.36). Serum PCT returned to normal range on POD 3 and remained stable thereafter. Phase 2: in patients with s uspected infection, serum PCT was measured at the same time of G-reactive p rotein (GRP) and bacteriologic samples. Among the 97 included patients, 54 were infected with pneumonia (n = 17), bacteremia (n = 16), mediastinitis ( n = 9), or septic shock (n = 12). In the 43 remaining patients, infection w as excluded by microbiological examinations. In noninfected patients, serum PCT concentration was 0.41 +/- 0.36 ng/mL (range, 0.08-1.67 ng/mL). Serum PCT concentration was markedly higher in patients with septic shock (96.98 +/- 119.61 ng/mL). Moderate increase in serum PCT concentration occurred du ring pneumonia (4.85 +/- 3.31 ng/mL) and bacteremia (3.57 +/- 2.98 ng/mL). Serum PCT concentration remained low during mediastinitis (0.80 +/- 0.58 ng /mL). Five patients with mediastinitis, two patients with bacteremia, and o ne patient with pneumonia had serum PCT concentrations of <1 ng/mL. These e ight patients were administered antibiotics previously and serum PCT was me asured during a therapeutic antibiotic window. For prediction of infection by PCT, the best cutoff value was 1 ng/mL, with sensitivity 85%, specificit y 95%, positive predictive value 96%, and negative predictive value 84%. Se rum GRP was high in all patients without intergroup difference. For predict ion of infection by CRP, a value of 50 mg/L was sensitive (84%) but poorly specific (40%). Comparing the area under the receiver operating characteris tic curves, PCT was better than GRP for diagnosis of postoperative sepsis ( 0.82 for PCT vs. 0.68 for CRP). Phase 3:Serum PCT concentration was signifi cantly higher in patients with septic shock than in those with cardiogenic shock (96.98 +/- 119.61 ng/mL vs. 11.30 +/- 12.3 ng/mL). For discrimination between septic and cardiogenic shock, the best cutoff value was 10 ng/mL, with sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 62%. Conclusion:Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass influences serum PCT concentration with a peak on POD 1. In the presence of fever, PCT is a rel iable marker for diagnosis of infection after cardiac surgery, except in pa tients who previously received antibiotics. PCT was more relevant than CRP for diagnosis of postoperative infection. During a postoperative circulator y failure, a serum PCT concentration >10 ng/mL is highly indicative of a se ptic shock.