A uniform, objective, and adaptive system for expressing rice development

Citation
Pa. Counce et al., A uniform, objective, and adaptive system for expressing rice development, CROP SCI, 40(2), 2000, pp. 436-443
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
CROP SCIENCE
ISSN journal
0011183X → ACNP
Volume
40
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
436 - 443
Database
ISI
SICI code
0011-183X(200003/04)40:2<436:AUOAAS>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
The large area of rice (Oryza sativa L.) production worldwide is critical t o the well being of large numbers of the world's people. Yet for rice, the most important single plant species for human nutrition, there is not a wid ely used growth staging system. Despite good points of the published rice g rowth staging systems, none has been used widely for describing rice growth and development. Consequently, an objective growth staging system with enu meration adapted to cumulative leaf number (CLN) would improve communicatio n among scientists, farmers, and educators. We propose a rice developmental staging system divided into three main phases of development: seedling, ve getative, and reproductive. Seedling development consists of four growth st ages: unimbibed seed (SO), radicle and coleoptile emergence from the seed ( S1, S2), and prophyll emergence from the coleoptile (S3). Vegetative develo pment consists of stages V1, V2... VN; N being equal to the final number of leaves with collars on the main stem. Reproductive development consists of 10 growth stages based on discrete morphological criteria: panicle initiat ion (RO), panicle differentiation (R1), nag leaf collar formation (R2), pan icle exertion (R3), anthesis (R4), grain length and width expansion (R5), g rain depth expansion (R6), grain dry down (R7), single grain maturity (R8), and complete panicle maturity (R9). Assigning rice growth stages based on discrete morphological criteria will result in unambiguous growth-stage det ermination. For example, using this system, two people staging the same pla nt will arrive at the same growth stage. This is because the system exploit s the presence or absence of distinct morphological criteria in a symbolic logic dichotomous framework that only permits yes or no answers.