OBJECTIVE: To evaluate positional hydrostatic effects on blood pressur
e determination during pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: We studied 30 normoten
sive, pregnant women at 34-41 weeks of gestation. Blood pressures were
taken in the sitting, left lateral, right lateral and supine position
s with a two-minute stabilization period between positions. The bisacr
omial diameter suns measured. Multivariate analysis of variance for re
peated measures was used to evaluate the affect of position on blood p
ressure. RESULTS: Mean systolic pressure in the right arm was 2.6 mm H
g greater than that in the left arm (P<.05). There was no difference b
etween the arms in diastolic blood pressure. Immediate blood pressure
in the lower arm was MO greater than in the higher arm in lateral posi
tions, and there were MO other significant positional effects. Observe
d blood pressures were significantly different than those theoreticall
y expected on the basis of hydrostatic effects (P<.0001).CONCLUSION: P
ositional effects on blood pressure in the lateral positions do not ap
pear immediately (within two minutes), indicating that hydrostatic pre
ssure does not account for these changes. The well-documented blood pr
essure reduction from longer duration in the lateral position does not
appear to be an artifact of hydrostatic effect. Repositioning pregnan
t women in the supine position to have the cuff at the level of the he
art is unnecessary and often undesirable when fetal perfusion is an im
portant consideration. We suggest that American Heart Association bloo
d pressure guidelines stating that all measurements be taken with the
cuff at the level of the heart to avoid hydrostatic pressure change be
revised for pregnancy.