Are changes in sensory disability, reaction time, and grip strength associated with changes in memory and crystallized intelligence? A longitudinal analysis in an elderly community sample
H. Christensen et al., Are changes in sensory disability, reaction time, and grip strength associated with changes in memory and crystallized intelligence? A longitudinal analysis in an elderly community sample, GERONTOLOGY, 46(5), 2000, pp. 276-292
Background: Little is known about predictors of cognitive changes in the el
derly. Sensory disability, grip strength, and speed of processing have been
established as associates of cognitive performance in cross-sectional stud
ies. However, it is not known whether changes in these predictor variables
are associated with changes in cognitive functioning. Objectives: (I)to exa
mine the relationship between initial level of three predictor variables sp
eed of processing, sensory disability, and grip strength - and changes in m
emory and crystallized intelligence (CIQ); (2) to examine the relationships
between change in grip strength, cognitive speed, and sensory disability a
nd changes in memory and CIO, and (3) to investigate these relationships wi
th the effects of age and sex statistically removed. Methods: Cognitive abi
lity was assessed in two domains: CIQ (3 tests) and memory (3 tests) measur
ed on two occasions approximately ree a nd a ha If yea rs apart in a large
community sam pie (n = 425; mean age = 75.8, range 70-93 years). Repeated-m
easures Anova was used to analyze descriptive data. Latent-change models we
re used to examine structural relationships between constructs. Results: In
itial levels of reaction time or grip strength did not predict rate of chan
ge on memory tasks. Changes in grip strength, speed, and memory correlated
moderately, suggesting that these variables have some tendency to move toge
ther over time. Sensory disability correlated with age but not with change
in speed, grip, memory, or CIO. These relationships held across the age ran
ge studied after adjustment for age and sex. Conclusions: The findings are
consistent with the action of a common causal mechanism underlying changes
in speed, grip, and memory. A number of methodological caveats arise from o
ur analysis. Cross-sectional and longitudinal data sets yield different int
erpretations about the basic component associates of cognitive performance.
Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG. Basel.