Mm. Poggi et al., Diagnoses, demographics, and utilization of care as encountered by three US Navy general medical officers, MILIT MED, 165(9), 2000, pp. 672-677
U.S. Navy general medical officers (GMOs) are physicians serving as general
practitioners. Although exceptions exist, most GMOs are not board-certifie
d in a specialty. They are postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1)-trained, state-licen
sed physicians analogous to civilian general practitioners. We conducted a
retrospective study using data generated from patient visits with active du
ty males and females from June 1 to 30, 1998, to describe diagnoses, demogr
aphics, and utilization of care patterns encountered by three PGY-1-trained
GMOs at an ambulatory clinic. A total of 781 patient encounters with 123 d
iagnoses from a patient population of 3,178 were recorded. This is an avera
ge of 260 patient encounters per GMO, at a rate of 2.52 patients seen per p
atient-care hour. Fifty-seven consultations/referrals were requested (7.3%
of encounters, 1.8% of the patient population). Personnel assigned to the c
linic accounted for 4.2% of visits (2% of the patient population). Patient
satisfaction was rated as "excellent" to "satisfactory, and no significant
morbidity was observed at 1.5-year follow-up. With PGY-1 training, GMOs pro
vide primary care to a substantial volume of prescreened patients and treat
patients with a majority of diagnoses without referral or unacceptable com
plications. The role of GMOs, and perhaps other physicians without specialt
y training (i.e., general practitioners), in selected settings seems valid
and may have advantageous medicoeconomic implications for military and civi
lian managed care systems.