O. Vassend et al., NEGATIVE AFFECTIVITY, COPING, IMMUNE STATUS, AND DISEASE PROGRESSION IN HIV-INFECTED INDIVIDUALS, Psychology & health, 12(3), 1997, pp. 375-388
The primary goal of the study was to assess the relationship between p
ersonality dispositions, coping styles, immune markers, clinical statu
s, and subjective somatic symptoms in a mixed sample of HIV positive i
ndividuals. Specifically, the prognostic value of psychological and im
munological measures in HIV progression was emphasized. Subjects (n =
104) were recruited from a cohort of 422 HIV positive individuals enro
lled in the Oslo HIV Cohort Study. The participants were given self-ad
ministered questionnaires assessing behavioral, psychological, and psy
chosocial variables. Clinical assessment and immunological tests were
performed at regular follow-up visits. Clinical status was assessed ac
cording to the Centers for Disease Control criteria. The immune marker
s used were CD4 T cell counts, beta2-microglobulin concentration, seru
m levels of HIV-1 p24 core protein, and levels of antibodies to core p
rotein. In addition, subjective somatic symptoms were assessed. The re
sults showed that measures of negative affectivity (NA; e.g. anxiety,
distress, tension) were consistently related to subjective somatic sym
ptoms and passive-defensive coping style. However, no consistent assoc
iation between NA measures and immune markers was found. Individuals w
ho developed AIDS in the study period had significantly lower initial
CD4 cell counts as well as lower scores on measures of active-problem
related coping (e.g. Positive reappraisal, Seeking social support) and
passive-defensive coping (i.e. Escape-Avoidance, Self-control). The r
esults suggest (1) that coping styles may merit a specific focus in fu
ture research of psychological factors and medical outcomes in HIV inf
ection, and (2) because of associations of NA measures with symptom re
ports studies of the relationship between e.g. stress, depression and
HIV outcome should consider these variables as confounders.