Redshift estimation from low-resolution prism spectral energy distributions with a Next Generation Space Telescope multiobject spectrograph

Citation
Hi. Teplitz et al., Redshift estimation from low-resolution prism spectral energy distributions with a Next Generation Space Telescope multiobject spectrograph, PUB AST S P, 112(775), 2000, pp. 1188-1199
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Space Sciences
Journal title
PUBLICATIONS OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF THE PACIFIC
ISSN journal
00046280 → ACNP
Volume
112
Issue
775
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1188 - 1199
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-6280(200009)112:775<1188:REFLPS>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
We discuss the utility of a low-resolution prism as a component of a multio bject spectrometer for NASA's proposed Next Generation Space Telescope (NGS T). Low-resolution prism spectroscopy permits simultaneous observation of t he 0.6-5 mu m wavelength regime at R less than or similar to 50. Such data can take advantage of modern techniques in spectral energy distribution (SE D) fitting to determine source redshifts, sometimes called "photometric red shifts." We compare simulated prism observations with filter imaging for th is purpose with NGST. Low-resolution prism observations of galaxy SEDs prov ide a significant advantage over multifilter observations for any realistic observing strategy. For an ideal prism in sky background-limited observing , the prism has a signal-to-noise ratio advantage of the square root of the resolution over serial observations by filters with similar spatial and sp ectral resolution in equal integration time. For a realistic case the advan tage is slightly less, and we have performed extensive simulations to quant ify it. We define strict criteria for the recovery of input redshifts, such that to be considered a success, redshift residuals must be delta(z) < 0.0 3 + 0.1 log z. The simulations suggest that in 10(5) s, a realistic prism w ill recover (by our definition of success) the redshift of similar to 70% o f measured objects (subject to multiobject spectrograph selection) at K-AB < 32, compared to less than 45% of the objects with serial filter observati ons. The advantage of the prism is larger in the regime of faint (K-AB > 30 ) objects at high redshift (z > 4), where the prism recovers 80% of redshif ts, while the filters recover barely 35% to similar accuracy. The primary d iscovery space of NGST will be at the faintest magnitudes and the highest r edshifts. Many important objects will be too faint for follow-up at higher spectral resolution, so prism observations are the optimal technique to stu dy them. Prism observations also reduce the contamination of high-redshift samples by lower redshift interlopers.