Tj. Wilson-holden et al., A prospective comparison of neurogenic mixed evoked potential stimulation methods - Utility of epidural elicitation during posterior spinal surgery, SPINE, 25(18), 2000, pp. 2364-2371
Study Design. A prospective study of 50 patients who underwent posterior th
oracic or thoracolumbar instrumented spinal surgery from June 1998 through
June
Objectives. To highlight the advantages and disadvantages of of neurogenic
mixed evoked potential (NMEP) data obtained with three methods of stimulati
on: epidural, spinous process, and percutaneous.
Summary of Background Data. Reports in the literature have established the
efficacy of epidural, spinous excess,and percutaneous stimulation of the NM
EP response. The three methods have not been compared for reliability, sens
itivity, and specificity.
Methods. The study group consisted of 50 patients who underwent posterior t
horacic or thoracolumbar instrumented spinal surgery from June 1998 through
June 1999. Somatosensory-evoked potentials were used to monitor upper and
lower extremities, An attempt to obtain NMEPs was made in all patients by u
sing percutaneous (PERC-NMEP), spinous process (SP-NMEP), and epidural (EPI
-NMEP) stimulation. These data were evaluated for reliability, sensitivity,
and specificity. The number of minutes monitored in the postcorrection per
iod were calculated for each method, and stimulus intensities were
Results. In the current study, PERC-NMEPs were obtained in 88% of the patie
nts and were maintained in 91% of those: cases, SP-NMEPs were obtained in 9
6% and maintained In 77%, and EPI-NMEPs were obtained in 100% and maintaine
d in 88%. Data collection continued in the postcorrection period for 46 min
utes for PERC-NMEPS, 19 minutes for SP-NMEPs, and 23 minutes for EPI-NMEPs.
The study group had no true-positive or false-negative findings.
Conclusions. Results showed that EPI-NMEPs provide reliable data in a great
er number of patients than either SP-NMEPs or PERC-NMEPs. However, PERC-NME
P data are readily maintained during and after the critical time window aft
er corrective spinal maneuvers. The NMEPs elicited with both percutaneous a
nd epidural stimulation have a useful role in an intraoperative spinal cord
-monitoring protocol.