The assumption of costs of reproduction were a logical necessity for much o
f the early development of life history theory. An unfortunate property of
'logical necessities' is that it is easy to also assume that they must be t
rue. What if this does not turn out to be the case? The existence and unive
rsality of costs of reproduction were initially challenged with empirical d
ata of questionable value, but later with increasingly strong theoretical a
nd empirical results. Here. we discuss Ken Spitze's 'superfleas', which rep
resent what we consider to be the strongest empirical challenge to the univ
ersality of costs, then offer a possible explanation for their existence.