M. Bouin et al., How do fiber-supplemented formulas affect antroduodenal motility during enteral nutrition? A comparative study between mixed and insoluble fibers, AM J CLIN N, 72(4), 2000, pp. 1040-1046
Background: Fiber supplementation during enteral nutrition has been recomme
nded but the effect of soluble compared with insoluble tiber supplements on
antroduodenal motility is unknown.
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare antroduodenal motor p
atterns in 8 healthy volunteers during and after gastric infusion of 3 diff
erent diets: a fiber-free diet, an insoluble-fiber diet, and a mixed-fiber
diet (50% soluble fiber and 50% insoluble fiber).
Design: Manometric studies with the 3 different dirts (2100 kJ) were perfor
med in random order. Antroduodenal motility was monitored continuously for
6 h by using a pneumohydraulic system to calculate the number. amplitude, a
nd duration of the pressure waves: the area under the curve (AUC); and the
percentage of time occupied by motor activity before, during, and after eac
h type of infusion. Variations in antral areas were measured by ultrasonogr
aphy.
Results: The gastric motor response was significantly higher, whatever the
diet, in the distal antral recording site than in the 2 more proximal sites
. In the proximal but not the distal antrum, the number of waver, the AUC,
and the percentage of time occupied by motor activity were higher (P < 0.04
) with the mixed-fiber than with the insoluble-fiber diet. No significant d
ifferences in variations of antral area were observed among the 3 diets. Ln
the duodenum, motor variables were not significantly different among the 3
diets.
Conclusions: A gastric infusion induced a greater motor response in the dis
tal than in the proximal antrum. A mixed-fiber diet was associated with sig
nificantly greater proximal antral motility than was an insoluble-fiber die
t. There was no significant difference among the 3 formulas in duodenal mot
or variables or in variations in antral area as measured by ultrasound.