Poor agreement between self-reported birth weight and birth weight from original records in adult women

Citation
Sw. Andersson et al., Poor agreement between self-reported birth weight and birth weight from original records in adult women, AM J EPIDEM, 152(7), 2000, pp. 609-616
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00029262 → ACNP
Volume
152
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
609 - 616
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9262(20001001)152:7<609:PABSBW>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Data from an ongoing prospective population study of women in Goteborg, Swe den, were used to assess agreement between self-reported birth weight and b irth weight obtained from original delivery records of women aged 44-60 yea rs. Of the eligible population with traced delivery records (n = 693), only 28% (n = 192) could report their own birth weight. Spearman correlation be tween self-reported birth weight and birth weight from original records was r = 0.76. However, a difference plot, with limits of agreement at -1,028 t o 1,038 g (95% confidence limits: lower limit, -1,157 to -901 g, upper limi t, 910 to 1,166 g) revealed poor agreement between methods. Of the self-rep orted birth weights, 53% were in error by 250 g or more, and 31% were posit ively or negatively discordant by 500 g or more. Application in an analysis of cardiovascular risk factors in adulthood found conflicting results betw een self-reported and recorded birth weights. Low reporting rate, poor repo rting accuracy, and misleading findings in application led to the conclusio n that self-reported birth weights from middle-aged women would not be a sa tisfactory replacement for birth weights from original records.