Jm. Sabate et al., Rectal sensitivity assessed by a reflexologic technique: further evidence for two types of mechanoreceptors, AM J P-GAST, 279(4), 2000, pp. G692-G699
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
da verificare
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-GASTROINTESTINAL AND LIVER PHYSIOLOGY
We previously showed that slow-ramp rectal distensions induce graded inhibi
tions of the somatic nociceptive RIII reflex recorded from the lower limb,
which correlated with both distension volume and visceral sensation. In con
trast, rapid phasic rectal distensions induced facilitatory or biphasic eff
ects (i.e., facilitations followed by inhibitions) depending on the level o
f distension. To examine the role of mucosal and serosal rectal mechanorece
ptors in these viscerosomatic interactions, we analyzed, in six healthy vol
unteers, the effects of both types of rectal distension on the RIII reflex
after topical application of lidocaine or placebo administered in a double-
blind and crossover fashion. Inhibitions of the RIII reflex induced by both
slow-ramp and rapid distensions were strongly reduced after administration
of lidocaine but not after placebo. In contrast, facilitations of the RIII
reflex observed during the initial phase of rapid distensions were not mod
ified after lidocaine or placebo applications. These results suggest that i
nhibitions, but not facilitations, of the nociceptive RIII reflex triggered
by rectal distensions depend preferentially on the activation of superfici
al mucosal receptors. This reflexologic technique might thus represent an i
nteresting tool for studying the role of the different rectal mechanorecept
ors involved in visceral sensations.