Js. Thresher et al., Comparison of the effects of sucrose and fructose on insulin action and glucose tolerance, AM J P-REG, 279(4), 2000, pp. R1334-R1340
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Physiology
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-REGULATORY INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether fructose is the n
utrient mediator of sucrose-induced insulin resistance and glucose intolera
nce. Toward this end, male rats were fed a purified starch diet (68% of tot
al calories) for a 2-wk baseline period. After this, rats either remained o
n the starch (ST) diet or were switched to a sucrose (SU, 68% of total calo
ries), fructose/glucose (F/G, 34/34% of total calories), or fructose/starch
(F/ST, 34/34% of total calories) diet for 5 wk. Rats then underwent either
an intravenous glucose tolerance test (n = 10/diet) or a euglycemic, hyper
insulinemic clamp (n = 8 or 9/diet). Incremental glucose and insulin areas
under the curve in SU, F/G, and F/ST were on average 61 and 29% greater tha
n ST, respectively, but not significantly different from one another. Durin
g clamps, glucose infusion rates (mg.kg(-1).min(-1)) required to maintain e
uglycemia were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in SU, F/G, and F/ST (13.4 +/
- 0.9, 9.5 +/- 1.7, 11.3 +/- 1.3, respectively) compared with ST (22.8 +/-
1.1). Insulin suppression of glucose appearance (mg.kg(-1).min(-1)) was sig
nificantly lower (P < 0.05) in SU, F/G, and F/ST (5.6 +/- 0.5, 2.2 +/- 1.2,
and 6.6 +/- 0.7, respectively) compared with ST (9.6 +/- 0.4). Insulin-sti
mulated glucose disappearance (mg.kg(-1).min(-1)) was significantly lower (
P < 0.05) in SU, F/G, and F/ST (17.9 +/- 0.6, 16.2 +/- 1.3, 15.3 +/- 1.8, r
espectively) compared with ST (24.7 +/- 1.2). These data suggest that fruct
ose is the primary nutrient mediator of sucrose-induced insulin resistance
and glucose intolerance.