OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the mammographic and
histologic features of cancerous lesions underestimated using 11-gauge vacu
um suction biopsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Retrospective review of 11-gauge vacuum suction biop
sy was performed to identify lesions diagnosed as atypical ductal hyperplas
ia or carcinoma. The histology of the core and surgical specimens was compa
red. Of 158 cases of cancer, underestimation occurred in 15 (9.5%). The mam
mographic and histologic features were assessed.
RESULTS, Of 15 underestimated cases, six were atypical ductal hyperplasia t
hat proved to be cancer (5 duct al carcinoma in situ and 1 invasive) and ni
ne were ductal carcinoma in situ that proved to have invasion. The underest
imation rate for calcifications was 16.3% (14/86) and for masses was 1.6% (
1/64) (p = 0.007). Most (5/6) underestimated atypical ductal hy perplasia c
ases were reported as "markedly atypical:" and four of nine underestimated
ductal carcinoma in situ cases were reported as "possible invasion." No sig
nificant difference was seen in the number of core specimens obtained or th
e sizes of the lesions for underestimated cases versus accurately diagnosed
cases. The percentage of calcifications retrieved was significantly differ
ent (p = 0.017). No underestimations were found among cases in which the en
tire mammographic lesion was removed at vacuum suction biopsy.
CONCLUSION. The cancer underestimation rate with vacuum suction biopsy was
9.5%, The underestimation rate for calcifications (16.3%) was significantly
higher than that for masses (1.6%) (p = 0.007), The percentage of the lesi
on removed was an important factor in reducing underestimation, as reflecte
d by the percentage of calcifications retrieved and the instances of comple
te resolution of the lesion seen on mammography.