OBJECTIVE. The objective was to determine the MR imaging findings that diff
erentiate intact anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft, partial-t
hickness tear, and full-thickness tear, using arthroscopy as the gold stand
ard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sixteen consecutive MR imaging examinations were ret
rospectively and independently evaluated by two musculoskeletal radiologist
s fur primary signs (graft signal, orientation, fiber continuity, complete
discontinuity, and thickness) and secondary signs (anterior tibial translat
ion, uncovered posterior horn lateral meniscus, posterior cruciate ligament
hyperbuckling, and abnormal posterior cruciate ligament line) of anterior
cruciate ligament reconstruction graft tear in 15 patients with follow-up a
rthroscopy. Results were compared with arthroscopy, and both receiver opera
ting characteristic curves and kappa values for interobserver variability w
ere calculated.
RESULTS. Arthroscopy revealed four full-thickness graft tears, seven partia
l-thickness tears, and five intact grafts. Of the primary signs, graft fibe
r continuity in the coronal plane and 100% graft thickness in the sagittal
or coronal plane were most valuable in excluding full-thickness tear Comple
te discontinuous graft in the coronal plane also was valuable in diagnosis
of full-thickness tear. Of the secondary signs, anterior tibial translation
and uncovered posterior horn lateral meniscus assisted in differentiating
graft tear (partial or full thickness) from intact graft. The other primary
and secondary signs were less valuable. Kappa values were highest for graf
t fiber continuity and graft discontinuity in the coronal plant.
CONCLUSION. Full-thickness anterior cruciate ligament graft tear can be dif
ferentiated from partial-thickness tear or intact graft by evaluating for g
raft fiber continuity (coronal plane), complete graft discontinuity (corona
l plane), and graft thickness (coronal or sagittal plane).