L. Lehtimaki et al., Increased bronchial nitric oxide production in patients with asthma measured with a novel method of different exhalation flow rates, ANN MED, 32(6), 2000, pp. 417-423
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
The concentration of nitric oxide (NO) in exhaled air is increased in patie
nts with asthma, suggesting that measuring fractional exhaled NO concentrat
ion (FENO) may be used to monitor asthmatic airway inflammation. However, i
ncreased FENO is not specific for asthma, as other inflammatory lung diseas
es may also increase FENO. To augment the specificity of FENO measurement,
we tested a novel theoretical modelling of pulmonary NO dynamics that allow
s the approximation of alveolar NO concentration and bronchial NO flux sepa
rately by measuring FENO at several exhalation flow rates. We measured FENO
at four exhalation flow rates in 10 steroid-naive asthmatics, 5 patients w
ith extrinsic allergic alveolitis, and in 10 healthy controls. Both the ast
hmatics and the patients with alveolitis had significantly higher FENO than
the healthy controls. The increased NO concentration originated from the b
ronchial level in the asthmatics and from the alveolar level in the patient
s with alveolitis. In the second part of the study we assessed the repeatab
ility of FENO test, within-day and day-to-day (during two weeks) variation
in FENO, and the effects of mouth pressure and cigarette smoking on FENO in
healthy volunteers. Repeatability of 10 subsequent measurements was high (
coefficient of variation (CV) 4.6% +/- 0.4%), and no diurnal variation was
found. The day-to-day variation during a 2-week period gave a CV of 10.6% /- 1.0%. The magnitude of mouth pressure (5-20 cmH(2)O in adults, 5-40 cmH(
2)O in children) during measurement had no effect on FENO. Smoking a cigare
tte caused a small and transient but statistically significant increase in
FENO at 1 and 5 min after smoking. In conclusion, FENO measurement is highl
y repeatable with low day-to-day variation among healthy subjects. Our resu
lts also suggest that the present novel method of measuring FENO at several
exhalation flow rates can be used to approximate alveolar and bronchial co
ntributions to FENO separately and thus increase the clinical value of this
test.