The significant progress made in pediatric oncology during recent years has
been due to a major breakthrough in the field of molecular biology and the
introduction of new therapeutic strategies that take into account both the
quality and the duration of life. Molecular biology has already been instr
umental in more fully categorizing the 'small round-cell tumor' group, and
in reclassifying the 'Ewing family' tumors. It also provides a valuable too
l for the prognostic evaluation of neuroblastomas through the analysis of t
he N-myc oncogene. In addition, it has permitted the identification of the
Li-Fraumeni syndrome of predisposition to cancer in the child, thereby rais
ing the problematical ethical issue of communicating relevant information t
o subjects at risk. Two examples illustrate innovative strategic concepts:
1) Burkitt's lymphoma, or an example of the successful de-intensification o
f treatment; and 2) brain tumors in young children, regarding which the des
ire to improve the quality of life has led to innovative attempts to replac
e radiotherapy by chemotherapy. Considerable progress has been made in the
field of neuropsychology, thereby permitting an imp,improved assessment of
disorders and a better management of rehabilitation programs. New anti-canc
er agents and also chemo- and radiotherapy that spare healthy tissue are al
so being developed. Gene therapy and molecular biology will play a major ro
le in future therapeutic strategies, and are now at the preclinical trial s
tage. This significant overall progress leads to a reconsideration of the o
rganizational approach toward treatment of the pediatric patient population
suffering from cancer, and a critical assessment of disease management, wh
ich should take into account not only the technical aspects of the disease
but also familial and social considerations (C) 2000 Editions scientifiques
et medicales Elsevier SAS.