Definition of relapse risk and role of nonanthracycline drugs for consolidation in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia: a joint study of the PETHEMA and GIMEMA cooperative groups

Citation
Ma. Sanz et al., Definition of relapse risk and role of nonanthracycline drugs for consolidation in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia: a joint study of the PETHEMA and GIMEMA cooperative groups, BLOOD, 96(4), 2000, pp. 1247-1253
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Hematology,"Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
BLOOD
ISSN journal
00064971 → ACNP
Volume
96
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1247 - 1253
Database
ISI
SICI code
0006-4971(20000815)96:4<1247:DORRAR>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Preliminary independent reports of the Italian GIMEMA and the Spanish PETHE MA trials for newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) indicated a similarly high antileukemic efficacy in terms of complete remission and d isease-free survival rates. To better investigate these studies and the pro gnostic factors influencing re lapse risk, this study analyzed the updated results of 217 patients with PML/RAR alpha-positive APL enrolled in GIMEMA (n = 108) and PETHEMA (n = 109). All patients received identical induction (AIDA schedule) and maintenance. For consolidation, GIMEMA patients receive d 3 courses including idarubicin/cytarabine, mitoxantrone/etoposide, and id arubicin/cytarabine/thioguanine, whereas PETHEMA patients received the same drugs and dose schedule of idarubicin and mitoxantrone with the omission o f nonintercalating agents. Depending on whether molecular relapses were cla ssified as censored or uncensored events, the 3-year Kaplan Meier estimates of relapse free survival (RFS) for the combined series were 90 +/- 2% and 86 +/- 2%, respectively. Minor differences observed between the 2 patient c ohorts were negligible. Multivariate regression analysis of RFS showed that initial leukocyte (WBC) and platelet counts were the only variables with i ndependent prognostic value. The resulting predictive model for RFS demonst rated its capability of segregating patients into low-risk (WBC count less than or equal to 10 x 10(9)/L, platelet count > 40 x 10(9)/L), intermediate -risk (WBC count less than or equal to 10 x 10(9)/L, platelets less than or equal to 40 x 10(9)/L), and high-risk (WBC count > 10 x 10(9)/L) groups, w ith distinctive RFS curves (P <.0001), The conclusions are that omission of nonanthracycline drugs from the AIDA regimen is not associated with reduce d antileukemic efficacy and a simple predictive model may he used for risk- adapted therapy in this disease.(Blood. 2000;96:1247-1253) (C) 2000 by The American Society of Hematology.