Effects of policosanol treatment on the susceptibility of low density lipoprotein (LDL) isolated from healthy volunteers to oxidative modification invitro
R. Menendez et al., Effects of policosanol treatment on the susceptibility of low density lipoprotein (LDL) isolated from healthy volunteers to oxidative modification invitro, BR J CL PH, 50(3), 2000, pp. 255-262
Aims The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of policosanol on
the susceptibility of LDL-C to in vitro lipid peroxidation in human healthy
volunteers.
Methods The effect of policosanol (5 and 10 mg day(-1)) on LDL-C oxidation
was studied in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conduct
ed in 69 subjects. LDL-C samples isolated at baseline and after 8 weeks wer
e subjected to in vitro tests of LDL-C oxidation. We tested the susceptibil
ity of LDL-C to lipid peroxidation in a cell-free system by the addition of
copper ions as well as in a more physiological system, macrophage-mediated
oxidation.
Results At baseline all groups were well matched regarding all variables. A
fter 8 weeks of therapy policosanol administered at 5 and 10 mg, significan
tly and in a dose-dependent manner increased the lag phase of conjugated di
ene generation (mean +/- s.d.) from 83.79 +/- 29.16 min to 94.90 +/- 25.50
min (5 mg day(-1)) and from 82.74 +/- 17.16 min to 129.89 +/- 35.71 min (10
mg day(-1)), while in the placebo group LDL-C oxidation did not change sig
nificantly. Policosanol (10 mg day(-1)), but not placebo, significantly dec
reased the rate of conjugated diene generation. Comparison with placebo aft
er therapy also showed significant differences. Macrophage mediated-oxidati
on was also inhibited by policosanol as evident by measuring thiobarbituric
acid reactive substances (TBARS). Policosanol (10 mg day(-1)) significantl
y lowered malondialdehyde (MDA) generation from 8.50 +/- 0.91 to 5.76 +/- 1
.01 nmol mg(-1) protein. Comparison with placebo after 5 and 10 mg day(-1)
showed significant differences. Policosanol significantly lowered total cho
lesterol by 10.5% (5 mg day(-1)) and 12.4% (10 mg day(-1)) and LDL-C by 16.
7% and 2-0.2%, respectively. Also, policosanol (10 mg day(-1)) increased HD
L-C by 15.2%. Five subjects withdrew from the study, none because of advers
e experiences. No clinical or blood biochemical drug-related disturbances w
ere found.
Conclusions The present study demonstrated that policosanol administered wi
thin its therapeutic dosage for lowering cholesterol (5 and 10 mg day(-1)),
decreased the susceptibility of LDL-C to lipid peroxidation in vitro.