Pa. Newcomb et Mt. Mandelson, A record-based evaluation of induced abortion and breast cancer risk (United States), CANC CAUSE, 11(9), 2000, pp. 777-781
Objective: Previous studies of induced abortion and breast cancer may have
been limited by differential reporting of abortion history. We conducted a
population-based case-control study to evaluate abortion (both induced and
spontaneous) and breast cancer risk.
Methods: All study subjects were aged 20-69 years and members of Group Heal
th Cooperative of Puget Sound (GHC). Incident invasive breast cancer cases
(n = 138) were identified from the linkage between the GHC enrollment file
and the Seattle-Puget Sound SEER Cancer Registry. Controls (n = 252) were r
andomly selected from GHC enrollment files and matched to cases on age and
enrollment period. All subjects had to have been enrolled at GHC for the 2
years preceding diagnosis (cases) or reference (controls) date. The unified
medical record of each case was abstracted for pregnancy history, includin
g prior induced and spontaneous abortions, menopause status, height and wei
ght, screening practices, and other risk factors.
Results: Compared to all women who had never had an induced abortion, the m
ultivariate adjusted relative risk of breast cancer in women with an induce
d abortion was 0.9 (95% confidence interval 0.5-1.6). This risk was similar
in parous women, and nulliparous women. There was no association between s
pontaneous abortion and breast cancer risk.
Conclusions: These results do not support a relation between induced aborti
on and breast cancer incidence.