Salbutamol via Easyhaler (R) produces equivalent bronchodilation to terbutaline via Turbuhaler (R) following inhalation of a single dose of equipotent beta(2)-sympathomimetic

Citation
A. Malinen et al., Salbutamol via Easyhaler (R) produces equivalent bronchodilation to terbutaline via Turbuhaler (R) following inhalation of a single dose of equipotent beta(2)-sympathomimetic, CLIN DRUG I, 20(3), 2000, pp. 165-171
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology,"Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION
ISSN journal
11732563 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
165 - 171
Database
ISI
SICI code
1173-2563(200009)20:3<165:SVE(PE>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the bronchodilating effect, tolerability and acceptability of a single 100 mu g dose of salbutamol inh aled via Easyhaler(R) multidose dry powder inhaler with a single 250 mu g d ose of terbutaline inhaled via Turbuhaler(R), also a multidose dry powder i nhaler. Design, Setting and Patients: The study was conducted according to a single -dose, crossover, randomised, double-blind with double-dummy design in four centres in Finland. A total of 29 adult patients with stable asthma withou t previous experience with the tested devices completed the study, which co mprised 2 study days with if-hour follow-up periods including spirometric m easurements. The acceptability of the devices to the patients in the study was also evaluated. Results: The mean (SD) maximum value of forced expiratory volume in 1 secon d (FEV1max) after salbutamol Easyhaler(R) was 3.14L(1.26L), and after terbu taline Turbuhaler(R) was 3.07L(1.11L). The mean (SD) percentage change from baseline of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) to FEV1max was 12. 7% (12.4%) after Easyhaler(R) and 13.1% (10.8%) after Turbuhaler(R). The ob served differences in the increase in FEV 1 and in the area under the curve (AUC) of FEV1 between the treatments were not statistically significant. F our patients reported mild adverse events after inhaling salbutamol via Eas yhaler(R), compared with five patients who reported adverse events after in haling terbutaline via Turbuhaler(R). Based on the VAS assessment of the ac ceptability, Easyhaler(R) was found to be better accepted than Turbuhaler(R ) in terms of ease of administration, ease of inhaling, and the strength of sensation on receiving a dose. Overall, 62% of the patients would have cho sen Easyhaler(R). Conclusions: Easyhaler(R) containing salbutamol (100 mu g/dose) is comparab le in efficacy and as well tolerated as Turbuhaler(R) containing terbutalin e (250 mu g/dose), and Easyhaler(R) was well accepted by patients.