American translation, modification, and validation of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire

Citation
Jt. Barr et al., American translation, modification, and validation of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, CLIN THER, 22(9), 2000, pp. 1121-1145
Citations number
49
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology
Journal title
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
ISSN journal
01492918 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
9
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1121 - 1145
Database
ISI
SICI code
0149-2918(200009)22:9<1121:ATMAVO>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Background: The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a 50-item health status survey specific for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (CO PD) and other respiratory diseases that is available in British English but not American English. The SGRQ's symptom-reporting component requires a 1- year reporting period, which may be too long for reliable and accurate pati ent recall. Objectives: The objectives of the present study were to translate the SGRQ from British to American English, modify the reporting period of the sympto m-reporting component from 1 year to 1 month, and assess the reliability, v alidity, and sensitivity to change of this translated modified version in a sample of patients with COPD. Methods: Based on input from American patients with COPD and health profess ionals, the SGRQ was translated into American English (SGRQ-A) and then tra nslated back to British English. For SGRQ-A reliability and validity studie s, patients were asked to report symptoms experienced over 1 year (reportin g period in the original SGRQ) and 1 month (modification made to SGRQ-A). W e evaluated 102 patients with COPD (50% female; mean age, 68 years; mean fo rced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1], 1.01 L) at an administrative ses sion before and after completion of a pulmonary rehabilitation program. The SGRQ-A, Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ), 36-Item Short For m Health Survey (SF-36), 6-minute walk (6MW), Medical Research Council (MRC ) Dyspnea scale, and pulmonary function tests (FEV1 and % predicted FEV1) w ere used in the assessment battery. Results: The SGRQ-A showed good agreement with the original SGRQ when trans lated back to British English. Internal reliability (Cronbach alpha) was >0 .70 for all SGRQ-A components except the 1-year symptom-reporting component . Test-retest intraclass correlations were 0.795 to 0.900. Construct validi ty was strengthened when all SGRQ-A components (except 1-year symptoms and most 1-month symptoms) correlated (P less than or equal to 0.01) with the M RC Dyspnea scale, 6MW, all SF-36 concept scores, and 80% of CRQ domains (r = 0.30-0.72). Discriminate validity was demonstrated when all components of the SGRQ-A with the modified 1-month symptom-reporting period were shown t o discriminate better between disease-severity groups (based on patient sel f-reports of disease severity) than did pulmonary function tests and the 6M W. Responsiveness of the SGRQ-A to change in health status was demonstrated when scores on the Symptoms-1 month and Total-1 month components detected significant improvements in patients' health status (P = 0.02 and P = 0.04, respectively). Conclusion: The SGRQ-A with a modified I-month symptom-reporting period dem onstrated reliability and validity in this sample of patients with COPD.