Partial liquid ventilation (PLV) represents an intriguing alternative parad
igm in the approach to the patient with acute lung injury (ALI). Within the
past decade, substantial information has become available regarding this t
echnique. Clearly, PLV is feasible in patients with ALI and acute respirato
ry distress syndrome (ARDS), and it appears to be safe with respect to shor
t-term effects on hemodynamics, lung physiology, and longterm toxicity (alt
hough further research is warranted). Although PLV has not yet been proved
to be superior to traditional mechanical ventilation for patients with ALI
and ARDS, PLV possesses an intriguing combination of physical, physiologic,
and biologic effects. The results of ongoing and future clinical trials wi
ll be necessary to establish whether PLV improves clinical outcomes in pati
ents with ALI or ARDS, or specific subgroups of such patients. Significant
work remains to be done to define the optimum dose level of PLV and the mos
t appropriate ventilatory strategies.