The investigations of bioavailability and bioequivalence can be classified
according to three separate areas of information. Firstly, estimation of bi
oavailability judged on a drug substance's in vivo characteristics taking i
nto account solubility, polymorphism, stability (especially under the condi
tions of the GI tract), gut wall permeability and first pass metabolism. Se
condly, evaluation of formulation properties including dissolution profile
in the GI tract and its contribution to exposure variability with respect t
o the desired absorption characteristics. Finally, maintaining quality duri
ng the market phase with respect to equivalence to the clinical trial formu
lations.
While in the first two areas, the range of the estimated mean values and th
e intra- and inter-subject variabilities contain the desired information fo
r proper medical decisions, in the third area the mean values and their con
fidence limits describe the quality with regard to the formulations of prov
en efficacy.
Guidelines should clearly distinguish between the different areas in their
recommendations regarding the intended information, e.g. mean values and/or
ranges and confidence intervals. New approaches of granting limited waiver
s for BE studies (e.g. Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS)) shoul
d be expanded to consideration of pharmacokinetic properties of drugs (e.g.
gastrointestinal metabolism, evidence for an absorption window, magnitude
of first-pass effect; half-life) as already partly implemented in the Germa
n waiver concept, and further (scientifically) validated to achieve world-w
ide harmonisation (e.g. via ICH).