Biomechanical comparison of syndesmosis fixation with 3.5-and 4.5-millimeter stainless steel screws

Citation
Mc. Thompson et Ds. Gesink, Biomechanical comparison of syndesmosis fixation with 3.5-and 4.5-millimeter stainless steel screws, FOOT ANKL I, 21(9), 2000, pp. 736-741
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL
ISSN journal
10711007 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
9
Year of publication
2000
Pages
736 - 741
Database
ISI
SICI code
1071-1007(200009)21:9<736:BCOSFW>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Although most authors recommend either 3.5-mm or 4.5-mm: cortical screws fo r syndesmosis fixation, the optimum screw size has yet to be defined. The p resent study was designed to biomechanically compare syndesmosis fixation w ith 3.5-mm and 4.5-mm stainless steel screws. Simulated pronation external rotation ankle injuries were created in twelve paired, fresh-frozen cadaver ic leg specimens. One limb from each pair received a 3.5-mm tricortical sta inless steel screw for syndesmosis fixation (group I), while the contralate ral specimen was stabilized using a 4.5-mm screw (group II). Sub-maximal ax ial ramp (0 to 1200 PI) and external rotation/torsional ramp (0 to 5 N-m) l oading was performed on each specimen prior to ligament division, following ligament division and following syndesmosis fixation. Axial fatigue testin g was then performed at 1.5 Hz for a total of 100,000 cycles (0 to 900 N), and each specimen was subsequently tested to failure in external rotation. Ligament division resulted in syndesmosis-widening (p<0.001) and reduced st iffness (p<0.001) during torsional ramp loading. Subsequent syndesmosis scr ew placement reduced syndesmosis widening (p<0.05) and increased stiffness (p<0.05). Following screw fixation, however, widening remained greater (p<0 .005) and stiffness less (p<0.001) than pre-injury levels. No differences b etween groups I and II were observed during submaximal testing. In external rotation to failure testing, group I failed at a greater angle (38.9 degre es +/- 4.1 degrees vs. 32.0 degrees +/- 3.8 degrees in group II; p<0.05). F ailure torque was slightly higher in group I; however, the difference was n ot statistically significant (17.8 +/- 2.0 N-m vs. 14.3 +/- 2.6 N-m in grou p II; p=0.082). Five specimens in group I failed by screw pullout and five specimens in group II failed by fibula: fracture (p=0.061). The present res ults suggest that there is no biomechanical advantage of a 4.5-mm screw ove r a 3.5-mm in fixation of the syndesmosis.