It is common to stress intellectual differences between Brecht and Benjamin
. However, Benjamins visits to Brecht in Denmark provided the occasion for
productive critical exchanges. This paper identifies significant common gro
und in the analysis of history the two undertake in the face of fascism. Ta
king a cue from their understanding of chronicle history, a common dialecti
cal view of temporality is suggested in Benjamins essays on the modernism o
f Kafka and Kraus and Brechts exile poetry. The sense that historical under
standing requires an imaginative dislocation is central in Brechts response
s to Benjamins study of Baudelaire. A careful reading of Brechts notes on B
audelaire, as well as on Benjamins book-project,makes possible a reconstruc
tion of their debate. Baudelaires Les petites vieilles focusses their views
of the relationship between antiquity and modernity. While Benjamin reads
there the modern artists resignation, Brecht sees parallels with the false
classicism of the Nazi spectacle and its petty bourgeois audience. The Parz
ellenbauer from Der achtzehnte Brumaire shows Brecht reflecting on similar
issues within a similar historical dynamic in his novel on Julius Caesar an
d Caesarism, and thus effectively doubling the explanatory force of the rel
ationship between antiquity and modernity which fascinated Benjamin.