Background/Aims: The treatment of common bile duct stones diagnosed during
videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy is still under debate. In cases of suspec
ted common bile duct stones, a double approach with endoscopic retrograde c
holangiopancreatography either prior to, or following videolaparoscopic cho
lecystectomy is the current routine in many centers. An intraoperative endo
scopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic papillosphincter
otomy and stone extraction has recently been proposed.
Methodology: We compared the approaches for suspected common bile duct ston
es in 21 cases of combined intervention endoscopic retrograde cholangiopanc
reatography during videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy to 17 cases of sequent
ial intervention (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography prior to v
ideolaparoscopic cholecystectomy). Complications and postoperative monitori
ng are discussed and reported on the basis of hospital stay.
Results: Although the efficacy and the complications are similar, patients
treated with the sequential approach stayed in the hospital longer because
of the double monitoring period during both after endoscopic retrograde cho
langiopancreatography and after videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Conclusions: A combined approach to suspected common bile duct stones durin
g videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy could be an effective and a financially
worthwhile treatment.