Toxicokinetic modelling of methyl formate exposure and implications for biological monitoring

Citation
A. Nihlen et Po. Droz, Toxicokinetic modelling of methyl formate exposure and implications for biological monitoring, INT A OCCUP, 73(7), 2000, pp. 479-487
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
ISSN journal
03400131 → ACNP
Volume
73
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
479 - 487
Database
ISI
SICI code
0340-0131(200009)73:7<479:TMOMFE>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
A toxicokinetic (TK) model was developed to describe the inhalation exposur e in humans to methyl formate (MF), a catalyst used in foundries, and to di scuss biological monitoring. The TK model consisted of four compartments: M F, the metabolites - methanol (MeOH) and formic acid (FA) - and, in additio n, a urinary compartment describing the saturable reabsorption of FA. Level s of MeOH and FA in urine, from an experimental study (100 ppm MF, 8 h at r est), validated the present model. The TK model describes well the general behaviour of MeOH and FA in urine after MF exposure. A nonlinear and a line ar relationship respectively, was predicted between MF exposure and FA or M eOH excretion in urine, and this has previously been seen after occupationa l MF exposure. The present model has been modified to simulate MeOH exposur e as well. Generally low exposures (concentration or exercise) produce only marginal increases in FA urinary excretions, but when exposure is elevated , urinary FA excretion increases because of saturation in the mechanism of reabsorption. Using FA urinary excretion as the critical indicator, because of its link to health effects, an occupational exposure limit value for MF of no greater than 50 ppm should be selected (based on predictions with th e TK model). MeOH in urine can be considered as a biomarker for MF at low e xposure, because of lower background values and of a linear relationship wi th exposure. At higher exposures, however, FA could be used as a biomarker as it becomes progressively more sensitive. But the use of biological monit oring for MF values. Under the present state of knowledge both FA and MeOH should be used to estimate only group exposures, rather than individual exp osures.