Overall evaluation rating scales: an assessment

Citation
T. Amoo et Hh. Friedman, Overall evaluation rating scales: an assessment, INT J MAR R, 42(3), 2000, pp. 301-310
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Economics
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH
ISSN journal
14707853 → ACNP
Volume
42
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
301 - 310
Database
ISI
SICI code
1470-7853(200022)42:3<301:OERSAA>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
A study was conducted to determine whether different overall evaluation rat ing scales would produce different results. Six different rating scales wer e used to measure three stimuli (the respondents' college, the Governor of New York State, and the quality of the current season's television programm es). The six overall evaluation rating scales were: an 'overall how would y ou rate' scale, a 'compared to what you expected' scale, a 'compared to the ideal' scale, a 'likely to recommend' scale, an 'amount of improvement nee ded' scale, and an 'if you had to do it all over again, would you?' scale. The results indicated that the six scales, although producing different mea ns, were all measuring the same underlying factor. In addition, the 'improv ement' scale produced more negative evaluations than the other scales and t he overall performance rating scale tended to produce more positive evaluat ions.